Community Survey 2005
overview
2005 Survey Report |
Data Tables |
Survey Form
We received nearly 450 responses to this year’s annual community survey,
above the number needed to have an accuracy of +/- 5%. Responses included
ratings of City appearance; City government efforts and communication;
community services that include transportation issues, public welfare and
age-appropriate programs for citizens; neighborhood conditions and traffic
issues and business districts conditions; safety issues; as well as a
comment section.
Throughout the report, we note trends that have developed during
the last several years, specifically those of five percentage points or
more.
Ratings
Most of the items (indicated by italics) on the survey were rated on a
five-point scale, labeled “excellent, above average, average, below average,
poor.”
For ease of comparison, average or better ratings are combined as “percent
favorable” and the remaining percentage represents below average and
poor ratings (percent unfavorable).
Trends
City street conditions are down 24 percentage points since the City
began tracking citizen evaluations in 1997, when the rating was 91%
favorable.
These ratings have dropped ten points since 2002.
Smaller downward trends have occurred for (keep in mind that there is a
+/-5% margin of error):
- Library services are down five points since 2002 and eight points
since 1997, though at 91% favorable, they are still highly rated. This
change could be attributed to concerns about cutbacks in services over
the past few years.
- Police services have dropped six points since 1997, however, at 92%
favorable remain highly rated.
- Both neighborhood police patrol and street conditions have dropped
five points since 2000, receiving 73 and 76% favorable ratings,
respectively.
- Programs for teens (high school) have increased five points since
2000, yet are the lowest rated programs by age group at 76% favorable.
In regards to safety concerns at night in specific areas of town, ratings
indicate that community members feel safer in the Lighthouse Avenue business
district. Safety concerns in the area have dropped six points (from 19 to
13%) since 2002. Safety concern ratings for Downtown Monterey remained
stable at 15%, establishing a dramatic favorable trend since 1997.
Highest ratings (99-94%
favorable)
- City park maintenance (99)
- Fire services (98)
- Harbor/Marina services (97)
- City beach maintenance (97)
- WAVE shuttle service (95)
- Overall City services (94)
- Garbage collection/recycling (94)
Library services and City medians, greenbelts
and street trees have both dropped from the top rated list, but remain
highly rated.
Lowest ratings (less than 80%
favorable)
- City street conditions (67)
- Availability of parking in business districts (69)
- Neighborhood police patrol (73)
- Considers/listens to citizen comments/input – City
government (75)
- Programs for teens (high school) (76)
- Neighborhood street conditions (76)
Of these, only programs for teens has shown an increase in
favorable ratings over the last several years. City and neighborhood street
conditions as well as neighborhood police patrols have shown declines. On
another positive note, satisfaction with code /zoning regulation enforcement
has increased and comes in at 85% favorable ratings, up seven points from
2002.
Written Comments
A frequent topic for comments, usually in the negative, concerns the
Public Service Center. Its necessity, value and even architectural design
have been called into question by some respondents.
Streets, in general, receive a large proportion of comments, in
regards to cleanliness, conditions (e.g., potholes), availability of
parking, amount of traffic, and speeding. Categorized separately, they each
made the top list of comments.
Occasional comments are made with reference to schools, which are
governed by the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District. Also there are a
number of comments relating to water issues.
There are also many respondents who call out individual City staff
or a department to thank them for their services. Raters also thank the City
as a whole for many of its features and services.
CONCLUSIONS
-
The City has maintained high ratings in
many areas covered by the survey during these past several years,
especially considering the economic challenges facing the community.
-
City street conditions ratings have
dropped significantly and are the lowest ratings on the survey.
Neighborhood street conditions are also poorly rated and declining.
-
Cutbacks appear to have affected ratings
and perceptions of the City’s library services. Although it remains
highly rated, it has dropped from the list of top rated items and has
dropped eight points in eight years, the second largest decline on the
survey.
-
Ratings of police services have declined
six points in eight years, the third largest decline, though these
ratings should still be considered high (92%). Ratings of neighborhood
police patrol have dropped five points in the past three years and are
the third lowest rated item on the survey (73% favorable).
-
Availability of parking in business
districts, the second lowest rated item, is likely to remain a
continuing dilemma. The low ratings for considers/listens to citizen
input may be related to the considerable number of comments on the new
City Hall.
-
Significant improvement has been made in
making Downtown Monterey feel like a safer place to walk at night. It
will continue to be a challenge to ensure that the majority of
respondents feel more safe at night at many of the locations.
-
Programs for citizens are a luxury in
many communities. The City of Monterey has provided many services in the
way of programs for all age groups as indicated by respondents. Programs
for seniors, adults and children are rated highly; programs for youth
and teens, although lower in their ratings, have shown some improvement
during the last five years.
-
The City is to be commended for its
exceptionally high ratings of the cleanliness of the City as a whole,
the maintenance of its parks, beaches, medians etc., as well as its
efforts to preserve historic resources and open spaces/parks. It is
hoped that ratings of the new item on protecting the Bay from pollutants
will only continue to receive even more favorable ratings.
Return
to top |